May 14, 2004
Ask Sally: She'll Know
First off, let me admit I feel a bit self-conscious ("self-referential" might be more apt) about this post, but I decided not to let that stop me from pointing out what I think could be a truly valuable wrinkle on the utility and purpose of blogs—besides, I can't claim it's my idea. It comes from the former head of IBM's Internet Technology division.
He characterizes blogs as "the first derivative of the Internet," and sees tremendous promise in their ability to fulfill what once upon a time it seemed the 'net itself would do: Permit everyone to be a publisher. Actually he (and I) don't want "everyone" to be a publisher; we want people who are experts in particular fields, who are thoroughly up-to-date, and who have at least a passing ability to express themselves, to be a blog publisher. Blogs globalize the familiar phenomenon, "Ask Sally; Sally will know."
Moreover, blogs have at least the potential to fulfilll the promise of Knowledge Management. He thinks, as do I (see a trend here?), that the problem with KM is not that it over-promised but that it under-delivered. After all, who would argue with the proposition that we should not reinvent the wheel, that we should distribute best practices, that we should distill the exact thing law firms sell: Knowledge. In reality, of course, if a KM initiative depends on forced collaboration mandated from above, the genuine experts are the least likely to share their crown jewels, and the knowledge-base chronically undershoots the firm's real expertise, discouraging adoption, discouraging contributions, etc.
Fine; now what? Well, does your firm have a 10b-5 guru? Challenge them with a look at The 10b-5 Daily (hosted by a corporate partner with Wilson-Sonsini in Reston, VA) and ask them to out-do it for internal use. An expert in practice before the Supreme Court? Appellate practice? You get the picture.
Published by Bruce at May 14, 2004 3:21 PM | TrackBackPublished to Cultural Considerations | Knowledge Management
"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive
voice on law firm strategy."
—David
Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy
"I just don't know what the profession would do without you."
—Chairman, AmLaw 25 firm
“Constantly stunning.’—Managing Partner
"I read three things: The Wall Street Journal, The Economist,
and Adam Smith, Esq.—and I tell my partners to do the same."
—Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better than
does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered
“Required reading: Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist
"You're the brand name in law firm economics. There is no one out
there—repeat, no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about
it more creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.