August 16, 2004
Is "Strategic IT" Over?
Can IT no longer confer a competitive advantage?
According to the well-publicized writings of Nicholas Carr, it no longer can. Whereas American Airlines' famous SABRE reservation system provided a true, and enduring, competitive advantage decades ago (and is still the subject of business school case-studies, as I can personally attest), Professor Carr argues that today's technology—Cisco routers, Dell PC's, even IBM services—are standardized commodities for sale to all comers. In such an environment, it no longer pays to be cutting edge; indeed, the very concept of "cutting edge" becomes questionable.
Rather, CEO's and CIO's need to be realistic about the changed nature of the IT beast, and specifically:
- Focus on "good enough."
- Drive hard bargains (a commodity industry is often one with excess capacity, and excess capacity typically implies tremendous flexibility in pricing at the margin).
- Don't be creative; shun proprietary systems.
- Challenge ROI numbers.
This last point deserves elaboration: One should, of course, always challenge ROI numbers, but I think Prof. Carr's point is slightly more nuanced—at least mine would be. To wit, one can no longer assume when investing in a "commodity" that cost savings will flow through unimpeded to the bottom line. That may be true for a day or a week or a month, but your competitors will soon adopt the same commodity cost-savings strategy, and you will no longer enjoy the "savings"—your customers will, through lower prices.
Which is, after all, exactly what Adam Smith would have predicted.
Posted by Bruce at August 16, 2004 1:13 PM | TrackBackPosted to IT | Knowledge Management | Strategy Printer-friendly version
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive
voice on law firm strategy."
—David
Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy
"I just don't know what the profession would do without you."
—Chairman, AmLaw 25 firm
“Constantly stunning.’—Managing Partner
"I read three things: The Wall Street Journal, The Economist,
and Adam Smith, Esq.—and I tell my partners to do the same."
—Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better than
does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered
“Required reading: Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist
"You're the brand name in law firm economics. There is no one out
there—repeat, no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about
it more creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.