About Bruce
Search this site:


Subscribe to E-Mail Updates
About the SiteAbout Adam Smith Adam Smith, Esq. Newsletter Adam Smith, Esq. Newsletter

August 14, 2004

Location, Location, Location

Is geography destiny?  It is if you believe that Philadelphia is "the worst legal market" in the country.  Sandwiched between New York and Washington, DC, without indigenous investment or commercial banks of any size, and with a high-taxation, business-hostile climate, its AmLaw 200 member firms' profits per partner ($431,000) pale besides the comparable firms headquartered in New York ($1.37-million), Washington ($846,000), and Boston ($697,000).

In a somewhat opaque digression, the article implies that the five "growth happy" firms (+49% in headcount over the past 5 years) have adopted the wrong strategy, since their PPP is up 42% over the same period, while the more conservative firms (+21% in five-year headcount) have seen their PPP grow 52%.  Although tempting, I'm reserving judgment (the "Scottish verdict," of "not proven").  Too small a sample size over arguably a very anomalous five year period.  Conclusions such as this can only be legitimized across more firms and longer periods.

To be sure, there are some local industry opportunities, including pharmaceuticals, biotech, and a bit of financial services, but it's clear the Philadelphia legal community is on the defensive in reaction to this article.  The most common line of attack is that Morgan-Lewis and Dechert, two highly profitable firms with Philadelphia roots, were classified as "national" rather than "Philadelphia"-based, thus depriving Philadelphia of a pair of nice upward-skewing profits per partner numbers. 

As for Morgan Lewis, I think the "national" moniker is fair.  New York, Philadelphia, and Washington each have "more than 250 [Morgan-Lewis] lawyers" according to the firm's website, so it's hard to say the center of gravity remains on the Schuylkill.  As for Dechert, that's a closer call:  There, the lawyer headcounts are 247 (Phila.), 102 (NYC), and 59 (DC).  To be sure, Dechert aspires to the "national" categorization (their website bold-faces, "international," in fact), and I think the "national" characterization is fair:  They do total over 700 lawyers across 17 offices.

Bottom line:  Counting Morgan-Lewis and Dechert as "non-" Philadelphia is certainly fair.

Not fair—indeed positively laughable—is the counterattck that "Skadden, Wachtel, and Cravath" should not be deemed New York firms.  Wachtel, let it be stated for the record, has one office in the world:  Here.  Cravath has two:  Here, and London.  Skadden is the only semi-marginal case, a truly international firm.  But their psychic, financial, and business center-of-gravity is hard in Times Square.

The question remains what a Philadelphia firm aspiring to more should do.  My suggestion:  An intra-city merger.  Bulk up, proceed to cost-cut and slim down, and get some people's attention.  After that, one could always be acquired....

Posted by Bruce at August 14, 2004 11:31 AM | TrackBack
Posted to Finance

Printer-friendly version
Comments
Another culture-versus-strategy puzzle, which makes me think of the following, which I freely admit is a riff: When a business decides that it can succeed because it mines a segment that is *relatively* uncontested, its success in its segment is proof that its differentiation strategy is reasonably good. But the issue is whether it does indeed have ambitions to exceed the richness of its segment. Naturally the question is "why should it?" Will expansion cause better product, lower costs, or greater customer satisfaction? If not, then the opportunity cost is likely to overwhelm the underwriting of the only remaining projected benefit: more distribution dollars per share. To cover up this risk, venture funding is the kind of ploy that typifies the decision to go ahead with the expansion. It happens under the guise of future profits justifying the investment, but the reality is that almost every time the reverse is the true dynamic: the availability of investment funds "justifies" the expansion. We've already become accustomed to calling this dynamic "irrational exuberance", and to simplify the description of what is going on here, the funded company shifts from selling products (services) to selling money. This would almost make sense if the company had already demonstrated a significant competency in doing that and remained on the right side of the law to boot. Caveat emptor, especially you investors called "employees"...

Posted by: Malcolm Ryder at August 17, 2004 10:59 PM

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


Law Firm Finance 101 Seminar

People Are Talking

"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive voice on law firm strategy."
David Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy

"I just don't know what the profession would do without you."
—Chairman, AmLaw 25 firm

“Constantly stunning.’—Managing Partner

"I read three things:  The Wall Street Journal, The Economist, and Adam Smith, Esq.—and I tell my partners to do the same."
—Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm

“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better than does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered

“Required reading: Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist

"You're the brand name in law firm economics. There is no one out there—repeat, no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about it more creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm

Links: law
Links: corporate law
10b-5 Daily
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate

links: economics
Atlantic Blog
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
Links: tech & culture

"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.