September 9, 2004
A "Pop Quiz" (and not from Al Qaeda this time)
Speaking of disaster recovery (the preferred term, with a nuanced difference, is "business continuity"), how would you stress-test your plans? Some months ago, I wrote about how the Department of Homeland Security should learn "best practices" about how to detect potentially fraudulent/illegitimate activities through studying the data mining and surveillance techniques of the most sophisticated industry in the world engaged in that very pursuit as an essential core competence—Las Vegas casinos.
Here's a similar analogue: The firm that suffered the greatest per capita losses on 9/11 was Cantor-Fitzgerald, tragically (in retrospect) housed primarily on the 100th and 101st floors of the North Tower. Now, nearly three years to the day later, you might imagine they have gotten religion about data recovery and business continuity.
Indeed they have: They practice "pop quizzes" of their recovery procedures, including such practices as:
- never ever "schedule" a drill; when it happens for real, it will be a surprise
- pick your targets carefully: to wit, whomever you think is least prepared
- wait until nights or weekends: the formal work-week makes up less than 25% of the hours in seven days
- assume the worst, namely that systems have to be rebuilt from scratch.
Now, does anyone else have such a demanding protocol? Hardly anyone. No schedule, full re-starts, and a never-ending sequence of pop quizzes. Another benefit: By definition, your business continuity plans will always be current and you won't find yourself, at the worst possible moment, fighting the last war.
Published by Bruce at September 9, 2004 3:45 PM | TrackBackPublished to IT
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive
voice on law firm strategy."
—David
Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy
"I just don't know what the profession would do without you."
—Chairman, AmLaw 25 firm
“Constantly stunning.’—Managing Partner
"I read three things: The Wall Street Journal, The Economist,
and Adam Smith, Esq.—and I tell my partners to do the same."
—Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better than
does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered
“Required reading: Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist
"You're the brand name in law firm economics. There is no one out
there—repeat, no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about
it more creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.