September 7, 2004
And, From Across the Pond,...
The British publication The Lawyer has published the UK equivalent of the AmLaw 100 called, inventively, the UK 100.
While many of the firms will be unfamiliar to a US audience, there are several interesting lessons to be drawn, particularly since The Lawyer has been doing this for five years now and they venture some five-year "trend" comparisons:
- Overseas expansion is anything but a guarantee of increased profitability: In fact, of the four "Magic Circle" firms with the most aggressive overseas-growth plans, only one—Freshfields—has managed to pull off its investment with a profit-neutral impact. (It didn't hurt that Freshfields' profit margin is in Microsoft-land at 45%.) If this is sowing the seeds of future accelerating profitability (as the strategy's defenders claim), we are still awaiting proof.
- At the mid-range level (meaning, in the case of UK firms, annual revenues from, say, US$40--$140-million), specialization can pay off. Even if that means, harrumph, litigation.
- Finally, mergers seem a viable route to higher profits/partner, although the devil is in the execution.
Here's the full table, with one column I added converting the revenue numbers from £(000) to US$(000).
As a completely unexpected, and delightful, bonus, The Lawyer provides an additional article delving into the accounting practices and even financial-collection metrics of a sampling of firms. [To the help with the jargon, work-in-progress, a/k/a WIP, is the value of completed but unbilled work, and "lockup" is the median period from delivering a bill to receiving payment.]
The main article ends on a speculative note, wondering whether US/UK mergers are slated to return. If so, you'll hear about it here.
Published by Bruce at September 7, 2004 1:06 PM | TrackBackPublished to Finance
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive
voice on law firm strategy."
—David
Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy
"I just don't know what the profession would do without you."
—Chairman, AmLaw 25 firm
“Constantly stunning.’—Managing Partner
"I read three things: The Wall Street Journal, The Economist,
and Adam Smith, Esq.—and I tell my partners to do the same."
—Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better than
does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered
“Required reading: Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist
"You're the brand name in law firm economics. There is no one out
there—repeat, no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about
it more creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.