� Physician, Heal Thyself (a/k/a Managerial Counsel for the Counsellors) | Main | Cravath Closes at 43-7/8, Down 1/4 �
October 16, 2004
What's the ROI on Our Marketing Effort? I'm Glad You Asked
"Marketing" a law firm, to many partners (and some burned marketing directors, I can only imagine), remains in too many circles a dirty word. Why is this, and what, if anything, can be done about it?
As someone married to a senior marketing and advertising executive, this parlous state of affairs troubles me. Yet, undeniably, it is current reality. Just check out this commentary on the situation in the UK, where the commentator finds the situation deeply distressing. Example: "Why should we do a brochure? We're not a trade union!" (The commentator is a marketing consultant, so doubtless eager to diagnose many nails, herself being a hammer.)
My reaction to the syndrome of marketing-in-the-doghouse in law firms is, as Cher famously said in "Moonlight," "Snap out of it!" In other words, treat marketing as an organizational asset and competence as essential as finance, IT, or HR.
Again I will remind you that a theme of this blog is that law firms should not, as a default condition of analysis, view themselves as intrinsically distinct from similarly sized service businesses. So, if the question is, "Where does marketing belong [sub rosa: if at all] in our firm?," the answer is to look at "best practices" in corporate-land. Therefore, I commend to all managing partners and committees, and beleaguered marketing directors, this article from CMO Magazine about how to demonstrate ROI on marketing investments. Or, guerrilla-warfare style, how to change the focus from ROI to one marketers can demonstrably win on mutually indisputable territory.
If you're still skeptical of marketing, remember this:
- "marketing" is simply information; if a potential client is unaware of your firm, its capabilities, or its relevance, they are not a potential client after all; and
- if you think marketing is only for the feeble or the otherwise challenged firms, remember the first rule of advertising: "The worst thing you can do for a bad product is to advertise it."
Published by Bruce at October 16, 2004 8:23 AM | TrackBack
Published to Finance | Marketing | Strategy
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive
voice on law firm strategy."
—David
Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy
"I just don't know what the profession would do without you."
—Chairman, AmLaw 25 firm
“Constantly stunning.’—Managing Partner
"I read three things: The Wall Street Journal, The Economist,
and Adam Smith, Esq.—and I tell my partners to do the same."
—Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better than
does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered
“Required reading: Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist
"You're the brand name in law firm economics. There is no one out
there—repeat, no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about
it more creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.