About Bruce
Search this site:


Subscribe to E-Mail Updates
About the SiteAbout Adam Smith Adam Smith, Esq. Newsletter Adam Smith, Esq. Newsletter

November 15, 2004

Human Capital Management

The Holy Grail of assembling the most potent and effective team for a client matter is, simply put, to have the right people in the right place at the right time.  Wal-Mart (and other companies like Toyota) have achieved this with inventory and supplies; what stands in the way of achieving a similar high-productivity, high-delivery-level miracle with people?  After all, in a knowledge organization such as a law firm, talent is your inventory. 

Of course, all talent is by no means equal, so to prepare the groundwork for "human capital management" means identifying and grouping your people by their subject-matter expertise and their level of experience.  In a law firm, much of this work is essentially done:  "senior corporate partner," e.g., says pretty much all you need to know.  But other distinctions are fuzzier, and worth taking the time to delineate.  For example, when is a "senior securities associate" more appropriate for a financing deal than a "junior asset-backed finance partner"?

Again, our friends at McKinsey have done a yeoman job of laying it out. Patterns may emerge that cause you to re-think how you've always done things.  McKinsey offers the example of a $100-million/year "corporate law firm" with undue attrition among senior associates, causing, in turn, an increase in writeoffs.  If it were to turn out that many of the departed, disgruntled associates had been working on a particular class of deals with a particular handfull of partners, that case-assignment pattern could be broken.

So can you run out and buy this software?  Not quite yet; McKinsey estimates another year to 18 months before it shows up in any form remotely resembling off the shelf.  But considering that it addresses the absolutely indispensable core of your competitive distinction—your talented lawyers—you should be thinking about it now.

Posted by Bruce at November 15, 2004 3:48 PM | TrackBack
Posted to Cultural Considerations | IT | Knowledge Management | Leadership | Strategy

Printer-friendly version
Comments
Here is a case where it is worth considering that you tend to find what you're looking for, not so much what's available. But what if the available stuff is more valuable than what you're looking for? KM in the legal domain necessarily must grapple with how to research "unstructured" data versus structured data(think narrative information as opposed to data bases). But that's not enough, because there must also be research by "formed" or formatted data - namely, certain classifications of docmentation, as opposed to certain classes of data. The real question in practical KM is this: if data can be discovered and acquired, will the firm take the steps to document the data, and will classified data get put into classified documents? This last question points to a many-to-many relationship for which control finds housekeeping (motivation) on one side, scribes and technology in the middle(opportunity), and business innovation (motivation) on the other side. To get a grip on what in this spectrum can be done with technology, visit the folks at Tacit Knowledge, a very content-wise California company.

Posted by: Malcolm Ryder at November 18, 2004 4:36 PM

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


Law Firm Finance 101 Seminar

People Are Talking

"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive voice on law firm strategy."
David Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy

"I just don't know what the profession would do without you."
—Chairman, AmLaw 25 firm

“Constantly stunning.’—Managing Partner

"I read three things:  The Wall Street Journal, The Economist, and Adam Smith, Esq.—and I tell my partners to do the same."
—Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm

“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better than does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered

“Required reading: Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist

"You're the brand name in law firm economics. There is no one out there—repeat, no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about it more creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm

Links: law
Links: corporate law
10b-5 Daily
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate

links: economics
Atlantic Blog
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
Links: tech & culture

"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.