November 6, 2004
Revenues vs. Margins in EDD-Land
My good friend and crack wordsmith Michael Clark of EDDix LLC is striving to break new ground in the world of publishing/distribution, by charging a pretty penny (>$2,000) for a conventional copy of his new book covering the landscape of Electronic Data Discovery, but also by distributing it in pieces across a number of blogs, with each piece free. (See the EDDix site for the full story.)
Adam Smith, Esq. is pleased to be selected by Michael as a participant, and fittingly enough given our economic focus we opted for the section of his book dealing with revenues, margins, and growth strategies. First, Michael's piece itself is here.
My take? Beginning at the end, Michael encapsulates growth strategies nicely. "Go for the low-hanging fruit." 'Nuff said.
The variance between revenue and margins is of far greater interest. Here's how I would visualize it:

As Michael implies, contrary to the received wisdom, leveraging IP assets through technology is not the profit driver it's cracked up to be, but personalized, human-touch consulting remains the fattest margin piece of the pie. Why?
- Technology is, at least in EDD-land, a commodity. This is not quite the famous "IT doesn't matter" argument, but it's an argument that there is no competitive advantage to be found on the technology frontier. No wonder margins are relatively thin.
- People, on the other hand, are a difficult asset to acquire (in the proper combination of quality and quantity, that is) and a difficult asset to replicate. This is not just true vis-a-vis one's competitors in EDD-land, it's probably even more true vis-a-vis one's customers. In other words, consulting services are the single most difficult piece of EDD "production" for a client to do for themselves.
Thanks, Michael: Strong, good stuff.
Published by Bruce at November 6, 2004 4:16 PM | TrackBackPublished to IT
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive
voice on law firm strategy."
—David
Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy
"I just don't know what the profession would do without you."
—Chairman, AmLaw 25 firm
“Constantly stunning.’—Managing Partner
"I read three things: The Wall Street Journal, The Economist,
and Adam Smith, Esq.—and I tell my partners to do the same."
—Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better than
does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered
“Required reading: Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist
"You're the brand name in law firm economics. There is no one out
there—repeat, no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about
it more creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.