July 1, 2005
DLA Piper: Second to the B-School Party But Still to Be Applauded
The UK's The Lawyer has a weekly poll, which as typically befits such "reader candy" items is usually trivial or gossipy, but this one got my attention:
"Last week we asked: The Lawyer revealed this week the resignation of White & Case's London head on the basis that "a significant fee-earning role and managing the London office were incompatible". Should managing roles be left to non-lawyers?
"Yes 64%
"No 36%"
Unscientific, of course, but if roughly two of three already endorse the notion of a professional layer of management, mightn't an enlightened campaign to persuade the rest be in order? Starting from the premise that rainmakers are best left to doing what they do best?
Moreover, the qualities that make for the crème de la crème of the legal profession – extraordinary thoroughness, a focus on spotting all the issues, exhaustive research, a high degree of risk aversion, an utter inability to risk being wrong – are pretty much a short catalog of all the qualities a successful businessperson will not embody.
Alternatively, one can take the DLA Piper route and recognize that if lawyers are to manage, they could benefit from immersion in some Harvard Business School executive education. A current article discussing just this initiative—for which DLA is sincerely to be commended—repeats the erroneous assertion that this is a first. Actually, Reed Smith struck a similar deal with the Wharton School nearly a year ago. While noting that law firm management is increasingly professionalized, the writer makes this odd observation:
"Management skills are not just about analysing spreadsheets. As with any business, running a law firm is about people skills first and foremost. Which means getting the best out of a highly talented workforce. That is the biggest challenge for any law firm leader, and some business schools with regular intakes of relatively aggressive, egocentric investment banker types forget that."
Pardon me? Since when are the leaders of the AmLaw 100 shrinking violets, and since when do investment bankers have a lock on the "aggressive, egocentric" personality type?
All in all, a confirmation of what I've been writing about now for more than awhile:
Driven by the size and complexity of today's multinational firms, management at a senior level is more than a full-time job, and we can use all the help we can get.
Published by Bruce at July 1, 2005 4:19 PM | TrackBackPublished to Cultural Considerations | Finance | Globalization | Leadership | Strategy
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive
voice on law firm strategy."
—David
Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy
"I just don't know what the profession would do without you."
—Chairman, AmLaw 25 firm
“Constantly stunning.’—Managing Partner
"I read three things: The Wall Street Journal, The Economist,
and Adam Smith, Esq.—and I tell my partners to do the same."
—Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better than
does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered
“Required reading: Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist
"You're the brand name in law firm economics. There is no one out
there—repeat, no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about
it more creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.