August 27, 2005
Let's Take a Page from the UK
I don't know about you, but I can't wait. For what? For the results of Legal Week's survey of the intentions of the top 50 UK firms regarding conversion to LLP status to come true:
- 14 of the top 50 have already converted;
- 28 of the remainder either have firm plans to do so or have it "under review;" and
- only 3 report they have "no plans" to do so.
Why does this matter?
Let's separate cause from effect. The cause of the wholesale conversion is, as would be the case in the US, to avoid "Armageddon [personal] liability" for partners in a firm hypothetically sued for massive malpractice—or for minor malpractice with massive financial consequences to others. Younger partners, in particular, so it is reported (perhaps having grown up in a more litigious world—I speculate), are beating the drums for conversion.
The effect, however, is what has my blood racing: UK LLP's are required to publish independently audited financials which, among other things, will show how much individual partners are making. (This is, alas, not so in the US—an unfortunate lacuna in our British law inheritance.) As the FT drily puts it, "solicitors have been reluctant to divulge such details."
As previously reported, Allen & Overy has led the way, with as pithy and compelling a justification as one could wish for: They did it "to be taken seriously as a modern, competent business." Attention, all you gaming the numbers: Time's up!
Published by Bruce at August 27, 2005 12:53 PM | TrackBackPublished to Compensation | Cultural Considerations | Finance | Globalization | Leadership | Strategy
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive
voice on law firm strategy."
—David
Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy
"I just don't know what the profession would do without you."
—Chairman, AmLaw 25 firm
“Constantly stunning.’—Managing Partner
"I read three things: The Wall Street Journal, The Economist,
and Adam Smith, Esq.—and I tell my partners to do the same."
—Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better than
does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered
“Required reading: Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist
"You're the brand name in law firm economics. There is no one out
there—repeat, no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about
it more creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.