About Bruce
Search this site:


Subscribe to E-Mail Updates
About the SiteAbout Adam Smith Adam Smith, Esq. Newsletter Adam Smith, Esq. Newsletter

August 24, 2005

"Productivity" In the UK Elite

The Lawyer's UK 100 listing will be out right after Labor Day, but we have an advance peek at the top 10 today.  Linklaters is #1 at £410-million in revenue (US$738-million), up over 8% on strong corporate-department performance.  Clifford Chance took second at £402-million, but up just 4%.  Both Allen & Overy and Freshfields suffered declines in revenue, with A&O down just over 1% (£358-million) and Freshfields down 6% (£320-million).  We'll have to await the full report to understand why.

Interestingly, 14 of the top 50 are US-headquartered.

Meanwhile, over at Bloomberg, there's a more analytic story that shows a reporter actually doing more than repackaging press releases.  (Since the California courts have held that bloggers aren't journalists, I can say that without fear of revocation of my press credentials.)   Bloomberg analyzed "productivity" of the top law firms, which they defined as revenue per employee (not per lawyer—per everyone).  Linklaters again grabs #1 by a healthy margin but on this metric Clifford Chance is not second but fifth, with Freshfields taking its place as #2:

Revenue Per Employee at London's Top 20 Law Firms.

Law Firm                    Revenue      Headcount   Fees per
                           (Millions                 employee
                            of pounds)               (in pounds)

Linklaters                   805          4770         168,763
Freshfields Bruckhaus        780          5245         148,713
SJ Berwin                    122           870         140,229
Allen & Overy LLP            666          4766         139,739
Herbert Smith LLP            265          1930         137,305
Clifford Chance LLP          915          6700         136,567
Lovells                      366          2779         131,702
Ashurst                      201          1539         130,604
Berwin Leighton Paisner      121           938         128,997
Addleshaw Goddard            139          1173         118,499
Clyde & Co                   104           908         114,537
Norton Rose                  210          1850         113,513
Denton Wilde Sapte           154          1414         108,900
CMS Cameron McKenna          163          1533         106,327
Simmons & Simmons            196          1904         102,941
Pinsent Masons               151          1518          99,209
DLA Piper Rudnick*           450          4851          92,764
Eversheds                    303          3870          78,242
Hammonds                     100          1439          69,492
Irwin Mitchell               102          1677          61,187

Source: Bloomberg Survey


*DLA merged with U.S. firm Piper Rudnick Gray Cary LLP Jan. 1. The
firm's revenue and headcount figure reflects DLA's for fiscal 2005
plus Piper's proportionate to the part of fiscal 2005 after the
merger, not DLA's total headcount plus Piper's total headcount.


To contact the reporter on this story:
James Lumley in London at  jlumley1@bloomberg.com.

Curiously, Bloomberg reports that "Slaughter & May declined to say" what its revenue was, while The Lawyer pegs it at £257-million, up 20%.  Different answers for legal as opposed to business reporters?  If I become a journalist, I'll have to remember that distinction—or else just call back and ask for someone else.

Posted by Bruce at August 24, 2005 10:33 AM | TrackBack
Posted to Compensation | Finance | Globalization | Strategy

Printer-friendly version
Comments
Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


Law Firm Finance 101 Seminar

People Are Talking

"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive voice on law firm strategy."
David Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy

"I just don't know what the profession would do without you."
—Chairman, AmLaw 25 firm

“Constantly stunning.’—Managing Partner

"I read three things:  The Wall Street Journal, The Economist, and Adam Smith, Esq.—and I tell my partners to do the same."
—Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm

“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better than does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered

“Required reading: Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist

"You're the brand name in law firm economics. There is no one out there—repeat, no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about it more creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm

Links: law
Links: corporate law
10b-5 Daily
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate

links: economics
Atlantic Blog
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
Links: tech & culture

"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.