� In the UK, They Call it "Ostrich Law" | Main | How Attractive is Your Firm's Brand on the "Supply Side?" �
August 15, 2005
Why Don't UK Firms Have 13% of the New York Market?
Pop quiz: Q.: How many of the AmLaw 100 have a presence in London?
A.: 70.
Surprised me as well, but apparently the number is only going to rise. Reportedly on the prowl for merger partners in London are Cooley Godward, Heller Ehrman, Proskauer Rose, and Ropes & Gray—and maybe others. Nor are US firms already there standing pat. Having just digested Shaw-Pittman, Pillsbury is supposedly eyeing London again (they've been there since 1972 but have only 20 lawyers to show for their efforts).
The numbers tell the story:
"The top 30 international firms [in London] posted an average profit per equity partner (PEP) figure of £789,900 during the last financial year, compared with an average of just £493,000 within the UK's top 30."
Pop quiz #2: Q.: How many of those "top 30 international firms" are US-based?
A: 30.
Again, the numbers help us understand why: The US firms "depriv[ed] their UK rivals of total revenues amounting to £1bn." While "deprived" is an odd word to use—the implication being that the UK firms are entitled to a 100% market share and that every £ going elsewhere was somehow absconded with—the economic impact of the US firms in the market is clear, as their revenue now amounts to 13% of the top 30 UK firms' total.
Not analyzed in either of these stories, nor in a third cheeky companion piece taking off from the trope of a personal ad [note to US readers: "WLTM" is Brit-speak for "would like to meet"], is the relative performance of the top 10 US firms in London, which varies widely.
For example, Latham & Watkins and Weil-Gotshal are, relatively speaking, cleaning up. Latham collects 10.6% of its global revenue from London, but with only 5.3% of all its global lawyers there and just 4.6% of its equity partners. For Weil, the numbers are 10.5% (revenue), 8.7% (all lawyers), and 5.4% (equity partners). Performance in PEP also shows a wide spread: Here, Jones-Day is the standout, with its UK-only PEP equal to 135% of its worldwide PEP, while White & Case comes in last in London PEP, just 81% of its worldwide average.
In other words, while many have been called, not all have been chosen.
Posted by Bruce at August 15, 2005 10:25 AM | TrackBackPosted to Finance | Globalization | Leadership | Strategy Printer-friendly version
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive
voice on law firm strategy."
—David
Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy
"I just don't know what the profession would do without you."
—Chairman, AmLaw 25 firm
“Constantly stunning.’—Managing Partner
"I read three things: The Wall Street Journal, The Economist,
and Adam Smith, Esq.—and I tell my partners to do the same."
—Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better than
does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered
“Required reading: Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist
"You're the brand name in law firm economics. There is no one out
there—repeat, no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about
it more creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.