January 6, 2006
Client Service Orientation: Let's Get Serious
Your firm is dedicated to client service as one of its pre-eminent goals, if not the absolutely highest priority, right?
Not so fast. Do you have a lawyer serving full-time as "Client
Services Advisor," serving as an ombudsman on behalf of the firm's
clients and responsible for creating and overseeing more than 60 "client
service team
s" (and counting)? Akin-Gump does, in the person
of Iris
Jones.
Swell: What's a "client service team?," you're asking.
Essentially, it's a tool for formalizing and institutionalizing collaboration among the various lawyers serving Important Client X. An example will aid understanding even better than a description. Here's how the "Technology-Copyright-Internet" group works:
"The TCI attorneys participate in client service teams with Akin Gump’s patent attorneys, litigation attorneys and other practice groups. This collaborative commitment to client service enables Akin Gump to assist in providing clients with comprehensive counseling in all areas of IP and overlapping areas of the law."
The goal is to approach the client relationship from the perspective of the client's business (and its concomitant legal needs) rather than from the perspective of the firm's legal expertise (which may or may not be germane to the client's business).
The latter approach—starting from the perspective of the firm rather than the client—is conceptually just plain mistaken.In practice, what does this really mean?
- First, as noted, it requires genuine collaboration. Teams
need to be assembled and re-assembled as the client's business and
legal posture changes. Now the team may need some focused litigators;
next quarter an offshore tax expert; and the quarter after that an
employment maven. Iris Jones' job is to stay on top of all
this and make sure that today's "A Team" doesn't become tomorrow's
"Irrelevant Team."
Does this mean partners need to "buy in" with their heart and soul? Check.
Yes, this can be the hard part: We all know that collaboration is not in the law school curriculum. But never underestimate the power of self-interest to trump training. As one Akin-Gump partner put it: "In an increasingly competitive environment, the client service team has been invaluable in [strengthening] our relationship." - Second, it requires plain old information-tracking. Call it "Client Relationship Management" if you like, but lawyers must have one centralized repository for everything germane about the client's legal needs and the history of its relationship with the firm. We've all had the experience of phoning (say) the cable company to ask a service-related question or inquire about a bill, only to find ourselves forced to explain everything from square one with a succession of several different people. As uninspiring as this is with the cable company, it leaves a positively ghastly impression coming from a supposedly sophisticated law firm.
- Lastly, it means the client service team has to have a vision of where the client fits within the firm's strategic plan—a vision which is both clear and nuanced. Lest I be accused of throwing around the phrase "strategic plan" loosely, I'll try to define it: "Strategic plan" in the sense I mean it is not the 3- or 5-year document delivered from the mountaintop and promptly shelved for terminal verboseness or immediate irrelevancy (the latter fate being nicely described by the epithet "OBE," or "overtaken by events"). Rather, a strategic plan in this sense is a continuously evolving awareness of the fit between (i) the marketplace's specific demands; (ii) the firm's ability (or short-term lack thereof) to meet those demands; and (iii) how the firm can develop to most closely align its capabilities and offerings with the evolving market.
Note the focus throughout is on "the clienit" and "the market" rather than "the firm" or "the lawyer."
We have all known in our heads for some time, even if we have not acted on it with our hearts, that excellent legal skills are merely the price of admission in today's globally competitive market. That means they cannot pretend to be your distinctive calling card; they're table stakes.
What could provide an enduring distinction, on the other hand, is responding to your clients' business (and, as a follow-on thereto, legal) needs with the same alacrity and professional focus the client itself would apply internally. Client service teams may not be the only route there, but they surely start at the right end of the service spectrum.
Posted by Bruce at January 6, 2006 5:53 PM | TrackBackPosted to Compensation | Cultural Considerations | Globalization | Leadership | Marketing | Practice Group Management | Strategy Printer-friendly version
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive
voice on law firm strategy."
—David
Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy
"I just don't know what the profession would do without you."
—Chairman, AmLaw 25 firm
“Constantly stunning.’—Managing Partner
"I read three things: The Wall Street Journal, The Economist,
and Adam Smith, Esq.—and I tell my partners to do the same."
—Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better than
does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered
“Required reading: Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist
"You're the brand name in law firm economics. There is no one out
there—repeat, no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about
it more creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.