� It's 2015: Do You Know Where the AmLaw 25 Are? | Main | It's Not 1977 Any More: So What Are You Going to Do About It? �
February 21, 2006
"The Magic Middle"
Every once in awhile, it pays to stand back and reflect for a moment on the "Adam Smith, Esq." community—yes, dear reader, that means you.
The more involved I've become with "Adam Smith, Esq.," and the more readers I've heard from and even met in the real world, the more I've come to think of it not as a "blog" but as a publication, with all of the responsibility for accuracy, even-handedness, and citation of original source material, that that entails. As the managing partner of an AmLaw 25 firm said to me, "The difference between you and The American Lawyer is that you publish a couple of dozen times a month." [And there's a nontrivial difference in the cost of a subscription, but I chose to be kind and avoid pointing that out.]
Have I, then (horrors!), become "Mainstream Media"?!
Wrong question, at least if you believe David Sifry, founder and CEO of Technorati, the first and in many ways still the best search engine dedicated to blogs. In a thoughtful and, blessedly, data-rich post, Sifry points out that some famous blogs, including the ubiquitous Boing Boing, have professional journalists on staff. Other sites which he classifies as "MSM," including Slashdot, let readers spontaneously create and populate their content.
The point is that the line between the MSM and the blogosphere is blurring, particularly as we gain more experience with what I think of as "Blogs 2.0:" Sites, like "Adam Smith, Esq.," that are professionally produced, directed at a focused target audience, and (so people tell me) offer content equivalent in quality and analytic rigor to anything to be found offline in more conventional media addressing the same topics.
That said, blogs are never going to supplant The New York Times or CNN, as this handy little graphic makes clear:

It's also overly simplistic to conclude, as the hypothesis of "The Long Tail" would have it, that you're either on the A-List, read by millions, or you're nowhere. Going just a very short distance further down the popularity distribution curve shows blogs gaining a lot of real estate on the MSM:

Sifry calls sites that are neither on the A-list nor irrelevant The Magic Middle of the attention curve:
"This realm of publishing highlights some of the most interesting and influential bloggers and publishers that are often writing about topics that are topical or niche, like Chocolate and Zucchini on food, Wi-fi Net News on Wireless networking, TechCrunch on Internet Companies, Blogging Baby on parenting, Yarn Harlot on knitting, or Stereogum on music - these are blogs that are interesting, topical, and influential, and in some cases are radically changing the economics of trade publishing. [...]
"And what is so interesting to me is how interesting, exciting, informative, and witty these blogs often are. "
So it's official: You are a subscriber in good standing to "The Magic Middle." And "Adam Smith, Esq." is a publication in every sense intended by that moniker.
Posted by Bruce at February 21, 2006 3:04 PM | TrackBackPosted to About the Site | Just Plain Interesting | Strategy Printer-friendly version
When The American Lawyer publishes "X is important," a hundred thousand lawyers collectively mumble mmm-hmm.
When Bruce MacEwen writes "X isn't important because of Y and Z, but make sure you keep in mind A," ten thousand lawyers set the coffee down, put the reading glasses on, and make the phone hold for a minute.
The real power of blogs is in credibility and personality. "The American Lawyer" is an institution known for mixing quality articles about the legal professional with generalized fluff, same as any magazine.
Bruce MacEwen is a smart guy who knows something about big firm management who writes frequently and writes well. I don't have some vague respect for the place he works at. I respect him. If I see him write something, I will stop and pay attention. If someone wants to disagree, they've got a big mountain of credibility to climb up first.
I can see why big firms don't "get" blogs since they live their lives in an institutional world. But ask a small firm or solo practitioner about the importance of personal credibility and reputation and they'll tell you their career lives and dies on it. The American Lawyer could survive an incompetent or corrupt editor or writer, but Bruce MacEwen couldn't. Correspondingly, if Bruce MacEwen proves time and again that he's a smart, informed commentator, he'll be more credible than any mere institution.
Here's a blog example: a few months ago, a few reporters and editors at the Washington Post grumbled that Dan Froomkin's blog shouldn't be called the "White House Briefing" because it wasn't a normal journalistic summary of the days events, it was a blog that linked to a wide variety of materials.
The Washington Post was blasted for days by thousands of comments on their message boards. Not profanity-laden rants. Intelligent, insightful comments with ample evidence of the problems of the Washington Post and the hypocrisy of their position.
The Washington Post accelerated their credibility spiral downward by shutting the boards entirely.
Dan Froomkin emerged unscathed, with the added credibility of a strong network of supporters. When I'm trying to figure something out, I pay attention to what the people I trust say to me about it, not the garbled and bleached result of an institutional process. The advertisements say people "trust" their media institutions. Some people do. I don't. I trust people. And I'm not alone. That's where the power of the blogs lies.
Posted by: Max at February 22, 2006 11:05 AM
Posted by: Jack Lake at February 22, 2006 1:49 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive
voice on law firm strategy."
—David
Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy
"I just don't know what the profession would do without you."
—Chairman, AmLaw 25 firm
“Constantly stunning.’—Managing Partner
"I read three things: The Wall Street Journal, The Economist,
and Adam Smith, Esq.—and I tell my partners to do the same."
—Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better than
does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered
“Required reading: Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist
"You're the brand name in law firm economics. There is no one out
there—repeat, no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about
it more creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.