� Bruce Profiled on JD Bliss | Main | Are Your Firm's Financial Reports Like the Federal Government's? �
February 7, 2006
What Color Is Your Toilet Paper?
Over in the UK, they're one step closer to the inevitable: Whole or partial public ownership of a law firm. (An investment bank is talking with "some of the largest firms" about IPO-ing them.) Regular readers know that I've been following the progress of the "Clementi Commission" reforms in the UK, the most notable of which is removing the prohibition on law firm ownership by non-lawyer-partners. In other words, IPO's for law firms.
Now, I would be the first to tell you that being public is not necessary, desirable, or attractive for most law firms as we know them today. Law—certainly among the AmLaw 200 or the UK 100—is not capital-intensive, and to the extent firms need a minimal level of working capital, it's far easier and cheaper to generate it through partners' contributions to capital or bank debt than to take on the enormous overhead of public-company audits and filings.
Then, of course, there's the simple issue of confidentiality:
"Any firm floating is going to have to issue a prospectus saying: "Come and have a look at us." As one UK managing partner puts it: "You'd have outside people crawling all over you, checking what colour your toilet paper was.""
But the Clementi reforms will accelerate one trend, which I can only applaud: The increasing professionalization of the managerial and business side of large firms. This will be a salubrious unintended consequence of the disclosures attendant upon being a publicly traded entity: The non-negotiable demand of the marketplace that your firm strive for best-of-breed in your category.
Posted by Bruce at February 7, 2006 12:48 PM | TrackBackPosted to Cultural Considerations | Finance | Globalization | Leadership | Strategy Printer-friendly version
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive
voice on law firm strategy."
—David
Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy
"I just don't know what the profession would do without you."
—Chairman, AmLaw 25 firm
“Constantly stunning.’—Managing Partner
"I read three things: The Wall Street Journal, The Economist,
and Adam Smith, Esq.—and I tell my partners to do the same."
—Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better than
does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered
“Required reading: Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist
"You're the brand name in law firm economics. There is no one out
there—repeat, no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about
it more creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.