About Bruce
Search this site:


Subscribe to E-Mail Updates
About the SiteAbout Adam Smith Adam Smith, Esq. Newsletter Adam Smith, Esq. Newsletter

May 15, 2007

Step With Me Through the Looking Glass to 1983

In doing some research about large law firm dissolutions (Brobeck, Coudert, Finley Kumble, Shea & Gould, etc.), I came across a November 15, 1983 article from The New York Times archives entitled "Business and the Law: Fall in Income at Big Firms." Join me in a brief time-warp tour through the looking glass.

The article stems from the release—or, actually, leak—of "the recently distributed Price Waterhouse study of law firm finances." According to the study, "the average partnership share at the 21 biggest New York firms that participated in the study - firms with 150 or more lawyers - was $232,110 in 1982, down 4.5 percent from $242,940 the previous year. Adjusted for inflation, the income per partner at those firms has dropped 11.6 percent since 1978."

To put those dollars in today's perspective, I ran over to the Fed's CPI Calculator and came back with the information that $1.00 in 1983 corresponds to $2.06 in 2007. Let's re-run the numbers:

First, let's try to produce today's list of New York's "21 biggest" firms. Since the article is evidently doing it by lawyer headcount, I took the most recent National Law Journal 250 (ranking firms by headcount as opposed to revenue, as the AmLaw 200 are ranked), sorted on "Headquarters City" (a self-reported datum), and came up with this, where the first column is the firm's NLJ 250 rank and the last column is their reported lawyer headcounts:

4 White & Case, LLP  New York  1,983
5 Latham & Watkins, LLP  New York  1,840
6 Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom  New York  1,790
11 Holland & Knight  New York  1,224
13 Weil, Gotshal & Manges  New York  1,142
17 Shearman & Sterling  New York  1,013
23 Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker  New York  964
26 Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP  New York  889
31 Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP  New York  828
36 Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP  New York  744
40 Proskauer Rose  New York  715
45 Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, LLP  New York  687
47 Debevoise & Plimpton  New York  666
49 Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP  New York  644
50 LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, LLP  New York  641
54 Sullivan & Cromwell  New York  627
60 Willkie Farr & Gallagher, LLP  New York  594
62 Dewey Ballantine, LLP  New York  572
64 Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, LLP  New York  565
65 Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP  New York  548
69 Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, LLP  New York  525

Whereas the cutoff was "150 lawyers," now the cutoff is 525. And some notables miss the cut—including Cravath, Cahill Gordon, Wachtell, and Schulte Roth.

But of course the real sex appeal lies in the partner income numbers. "Outside New York," according to the P-W study, "median net income per partner is $143,000"—or barely $300,000 in today's dollars. The New Yorkers, then as now, were outperforming, but using our CPI adjustment only gets them to an average of $478,000/year. And there's more:

"Another sign that the biggest law firms are getting squeezed financially is that they are borrowing more money. According to the Price Waterhouse survey, average debt per partner at the big New York firms was $18,000 in 1982, up more than $7,000 from the previous year.

"Then too, there is a decline of about 1 percent in the number of billable hours. At the big New York firms that took part in the study, the average partner was billing 1,530 hours a year, while the average associate managed 1,767 hours."

Today people have monthly AMEX statements higher than $18,000, and billing a relaxed 1,500+ hours will bring a personal closed-door visit from the Managing Partner.

But now, as they say, the "money quote" (no pun, etc.) and the reason the search engine tagged this article for me:
"The survey may offer a good overall picture of the finances of legal practice, but a memo leaked by one of the partners at Shea & Gould gives a more intimate look at how one firm split the partnership pie in their 1982 fiscal year.

"While William A. Shea and Milton Gould, the two politically well-connected name partners, received $646,000 each, 14 of their partners got less than $100,000 - and the newest partners, Harvey Feldschrieber, James E. Frankel and Mark L. Friedman, got only $55,000. [...]

"After Mr. Shea and Mr. Gould, the five [executive] committee members are the highest paid. Bruce Hecker, Bernard Ruggieri, Martin Shelton and Allan Tessler got $415,000 last year, and the fifth member, Thomas Constance, $410,000."

You can do the CPI calculation for yourself, and compare the short-sticked partners to today's starting associate salaries, but before returning to the 21st Century with you I want to point out an interesting ratio: First-year associate salaries in 1982 were just shy of $40,000, meaning Shea & Gould's executive committee members earned about 10x what a first-year did. I would be very surprised to learn today that any of the 21 firms listed above have executive committee members making "only" 10x what a first-year in 2007 makes. If CEO compensation in corporate-land has outstripped proportionate growth in middle management compensation since the 1980's, perhaps our industry is following the same path.

On the other hand, associates have enjoyed a real, inflation-adjusted doubling of their salaries, so maybe we are making progress after all.

But then, there's always Wachtell. The article concludes thus:

"If those numbers sound good, consider Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, where even the junior partners earn $450,000 and senior partners like Martin Lipton, the takeover specialist who has made the firm's fortune, get more than $1 million a year. Wachtell, Lipton lawyers work hard for that money, though, averaging about 2,500 billable hours a year."
Plus ça change.

Published by Bruce at May 15, 2007 3:57 PM | TrackBack
Published to Compensation | Cultural Considerations | Finance | Partnership Structures

Comments
By my math, and assuming that associates at top firms are now regularly billing 2100 plus, associates have had their salaries doubled and are working about 25% more. Seems like a good deal, right? I disagree. Those 25% more hours come directly from leisure, time we would spend on family, friends, and outside interests. They are, in a word, what the associate would call "his life" outside work. To buy that life, you must pay more than you did for his first 40 hours of work each work, which he is happy to give up for a fair price. So to get those extra 25% more, you have to double their salaries. So who's better off the associates of today or 25 years ago? I would say the associates of 25 years ago. They made $80K in real money plus bonus and worked a reasonable amount of hours. I, and I think a lot of other young associates at top firms, would take that bargain in a second, provided you could still get the prestige of working at a big firm.

Published by: 11luke Author Profile Page at May 24, 2007 1:51 PM

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


Law Firm Finance 101 Seminar

People Are Talking

"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive voice on law firm strategy."
David Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy

"I just don't know what the profession would do without you."
—Chairman, AmLaw 25 firm

“Constantly stunning.’—Managing Partner

"I read three things:  The Wall Street Journal, The Economist, and Adam Smith, Esq.—and I tell my partners to do the same."
—Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm

“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better than does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered

“Required reading: Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist

"You're the brand name in law firm economics. There is no one out there—repeat, no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about it more creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing Partner, AmLaw 50 firm

Links: law
Links: corporate law
10b-5 Daily
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate

links: economics
Atlantic Blog
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
Links: tech & culture

"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.