April 10, 2008
Why KM Matters. With Soundtrack.
Here at "Adam Smith, Esq." I've written about Knowledge Management a fair amount, since it's my belief that knowledge is what law firms sell.
But despite the (I believe) inarguable centrality of KM to what we do, there are three enormous problems with it:
- Too many lawyers don't understand why it's of value to them, or, more precisely, why the return they could get out of it would exceed the investment they'd have to put into it. (Never mind the threat of "giving away" your core professional asset—what you know.)
- Too many technologists and IT types don't understand how lawyers work, and end up creating shockingly powerful but essentially useless applications.
- And even the most powerful and user-friendly system requires constant care and feeding because legal learning is in a state of constant flux: In a sense, pure white ignorance beats obsolete and mistaken knowledge.
Because some of these obstacles are a blend of the intellectual and the emotional, a brief foray, presented in video, yields two of the best visceral explanations of why Knowledge Management matters.
With a big fat hat tip to Matthew Parsons and Neil Richards of Knowledge Thoughts, then, our first (2:21 running time, sponsor's logo at the very end):
And our second (5:29 run time, academic credit and "CC" license at the end):
Enjoy.
And reflect.
Posted by Bruce at April 10, 2008 11:20 AM | TrackBackPosted to Cultural Considerations | IT | Knowledge Management | Practice Group Management Printer-friendly version
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
"Adam Smith, Esq. is, and will remain, the definitive voice on law firm strategy."
—David Jabbari, Global Head of Know-How, Allen & Overy
“Esteemed
sir: Your analysis is, as ever, spot on. I AM enjoying ‘Adam Smith,
Esq.’—you’re a thoughtful person. Ever-stimulating and readable.”
—David
Maister
“Outstanding;
very insightful.”
—UCLA Law Prof. Stephen
Bainbridge
“Always must-reading.”
—Charles Green, co-author of The
Trusted Advisor
“You have a fascinating niche which you cover ever so much better
than does the conventional legal press.”
—Walter Olson of Overlawyered
“One of at most half a dozen true thought
leaders online. Unsurpassed.”—Bruce
Marcus
“Required reading:
Amazing.”—Venture Capitalist
"You're the brand
name in law firm economics. There is no one out there—repeat,
no one—who covers this business better, or thinks about it more
creatively, than you. I tell people this guy is really, really good."
—Chair/Managing
Partner, AmLaw 50 firm
Business Pundit
CorporateCounsel.Net Blog
Conglomerate
BusFilm by Larry Ribstein
Business Pundit
Carnival of the Capitalists
Chicago Boyz
Ensight
Marginal Revolution
Ronald Coase Institute
Stephen Bainbridge
"Adam Smith, Esq.,"® an inquiry into the economics of law firms, and the maroon banner, are a federally registered trademark belonging to Adam Smith, Esq., LLC, which is partially owned and controlled by Bruce MacEwen.
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
